Tool-using agents
Agents connected to APIs, documents, CRM/ERP surfaces, support queues, and internal tools.
Maze Tech · Agentic Systems Engineering — South Africa
Maze Tech designs, builds, and governs agentic systems that use tools, follow approval rules, generate telemetry, and operate inside defined business boundaries.
Doc MT-01 · Operating envelope Buyers: CEO / COO · CIO / CTO · CISO · Compliance · Procurement / CFO
01 · The buyer problem
South African companies have moved from AI curiosity to AI exposure. Reports, research, support drafts, analysis, and internal workflows are already assisted by generative AI. Most organisations still lack a clear answer to four questions: who owns the system, what data may it use, what actions may it take, and how is the work checked?
Who signs off
CEO / COO
Operating risk, accountability, and where AI touches core workflows.
CIO / CTO
Architecture, integration, ownership, and system reliability.
CISO
Data boundaries, least privilege, and traceability.
Compliance
POPIA obligations and audit evidence that survives review.
Procurement / CFO
Phased scope, fixed milestones, and defensible spend.
02 · What Maze Tech builds
Not chatbots with broad access. Not a model demo dressed as a product. Each system is scoped around an operational workflow, a permission model, an approval path, and a way to prove behaviour over time.
Agents connected to APIs, documents, CRM/ERP surfaces, support queues, and internal tools.
Human checkpoints for financial, customer-facing, legal, or hard-to-reverse actions.
Trace records for prompts, tool calls, approval decisions, exceptions, spend, and operator feedback.
Scenario packs for accuracy, policy adherence, prompt-injection resistance, and regression checks.
Ownership, risk tiers, access rules, model/provider records, review cadence, and incident routines.
Least privilege, scoped secrets, user-context execution, audit trails, monitoring, and rollback paths.
03 · Why agents fail in production
The model is the smallest part of an agentic system. The failure modes that end pilots sit in the machinery around it: permissions, approvals, evidence, ownership.
Broad tool access
No approval checkpoints
No audit trail
No evaluation suite
Unclear ownership
No rollback path
Weak prompt-injection testing
No cost or latency telemetry
04 · Production Control Model
Maze Tech operates as a control layer over agentic work. Every agent has a boundary. Every action has a route. Every exception has evidence.
Define the workflow, decisions, data sources, and actions that stay human-only.
Limit each agent to named systems, schemas, permissions, and failure behaviour.
Route sensitive, costly, customer-facing, or irreversible actions to named reviewers.
Record inputs, tool calls, approvals, exceptions, cost, latency, and feedback.
Replay real cases against policy, source grounding, refusal behaviour, and regressions.
Assign risk rating, review cadence, change control, incident path, and retirement criteria.
05 · Use cases by operating area
Each use case starts as one bounded workflow with a named owner, a data boundary, and an approval path. Expansion happens only after the evaluation suite holds.
Internal request triage, exception handling, SOP-guided work, supplier document processing, report packs.
Support triage, complaint classification, call and email summaries, approved response drafting.
Invoice extraction, reconciliation support, procurement research, policy-guided approvals.
Account research, proposal drafts, CRM hygiene, sales-call intelligence, tender support.
Policy lookup, control evidence collection, audit-prep workflows, regulatory monitoring.
06 · Governance, security and POPIA
Maze Tech designs agentic systems with data boundaries, scoped permissions, approval thresholds, trace records, and review artifacts that executives, IT, risk, and compliance teams can inspect.
07 · Engagement model
Four phases. Each phase has a defined deliverable and an exit gate. You can stop after any phase with useful artifacts in hand.
AI opportunity and exposure scan, workflow shortlist, data and tool review, governance-readiness check, and priority roadmap.
Exit deliverable: priority roadmap + readiness report
One bounded workflow, named users, limited tool access, approval gates, telemetry, evals, and a production-readiness report.
Exit deliverable: production-readiness report
Secure architecture, integrations, eval suite, observability, governance documentation, and deployment support.
Exit deliverable: deployed system + governance pack
Monitoring, incident review, eval updates, model and provider changes, governance reviews, and backlog management.
Exit deliverable: operating cadence + review records
08 · Proof model
Maze Tech does not publish unverified client results. Trust comes from the shape of the work: control documents, evaluation packs, telemetry models, architecture traces, and a private technical walkthrough.
09 · Questions buyers ask
You may not be ready for full autonomy. You are ready to map current AI use, choose one safe workflow, and define the guardrails.
Start with a bounded workflow, approved sources, narrow tool access, and measurable outputs. Data readiness is assessed per workflow.
Uncontrolled AI creates the risk. Governed systems reduce it with data boundaries, logging, approvals, and incident paths.
General tools are not governed agentic systems. Maze Tech builds workflow-specific agents with tool contracts, traces, evals, and approval gates.
High-impact actions should not be fully autonomous. They pass through policy checks, scoped permissions, rate limits, and human approval.
Start with one measurable workflow: manual touches, cycle time, backlog, response time, review load, or evidence collection effort. Baseline before promising ROI.
10 · Next step
Bring one workflow, one risk concern, or one internal AI problem. Maze Tech will help define the operating boundary, the first pilot path, and the governance artifacts needed to proceed.
Maze Tech Solutions (Pty) Ltd · Musgrave, Durban, South Africa